Comparing Holt and Gardner’s arguments
|
Holt’s criticisms of
schools |
Gardner’s multiple
intelligences |
|
1.
They convert curiosity, natural intelligence,
confidence into passiveness, dependence,
boredom, low self-esteem par 1-5
|
|
|
2.
Discourage experimentation, creativity and
originality 1 |
|
|
3.
Teach children learning is separate from living.
Learning becomes passive 2
|
|
|
4.
Neglect students needs and interest; show no
respect for individual differences 3
|
|
|
5.
Teach students to be wrong, uncertain, confused
is a crime, the result is fake, bluff, cheat 4
|
|
|
6.
Teach students not to interact with other people
5 live without paying attention 6
|
MI and EI stress
interpersonal and intrapersonal abilities |
|
7.
Schools are ugly, cold 6
|
|
|
8.
Encourage dishonesty, suspicion, anxiety7
|
|
|
9.
Provide no opportunity to learn about real world
10-11 |
Existential intelligence |
|
Holt’s recommendations
for improving schools |
|
|
1.
Abolish compulsory attendance 8-9
|
|
|
2.
Take students into community to learn about real
world first hand10
|
Students should develop
diverse intelligences |
|
3.
Bring real world into schools, different
professions, talk about what they do 11
|
MI and EI reflect a
broad, flexible notion of human intelligence vs
a fixed permanent measure of human ability 5 |
|
4.
Encourage students to work together and learn
from one another 12 |
MI and EI stress
interpersonal and intrapersonal abilities; MI
stresses that specific aspects of intelligence
vary cross-culturally vs traditional idea of
intelligence 5 |
|
5.
Encourage students to learn to evaluate their
own work to find mistakes and correct them 13 |
Holistic evaluation:
portfolio 7 |
|
6.
Eliminate grades, exams and marks 13
|
Mi and EI emphasize
different ways of assessing a person’s diverse
abilities such as portfolios and descriptive
assessment 7 |
|
7.
Abolish fixed, required curriculum 14
|
|