February 16, 2012
Met on Feb 7
Final Answer: potential $4.0M deficit for 2012-2013 that we
must plan for (because we don't know if the election initiative will pass)
Planning Assumptions #5-7 seem important for the Academic
Senate. The institution will look at new regulations, T5 changes, pending
legislation, and results of research like Rosaleen is reporting to us and
determine how to redistribute existing resources. It is a zero sum game. This is
why these reports from Rosaleen are more than entertainment.
If the initiative doesn't pass, there will be a ~400 FTES
workload reduction. The institution will have to look at the items above to
determine where/how to make those cuts.
There were several information only Blue Hands Form agenda
items. These are for informational purposes when a new person is hired into a
pre-existing position. At this point there was discussion from a couple of
members about the efficacy of hiring new people (to existing positions) while
the possibility of RIFs looms once again. It came to light that these committee
members (not the administration) were talking about a hiring freeze. College
Council Chair Alan Haffa then asked some of the folks who had been more quiet to
add their perspectives to this issue. It turned out that almost everybody on the
College Council was opposed to hiring freezes at this time.
Why am I mentioning this?
It is *not* to advocate for one or another deficit reduction
It *is* to demonstrate that conversations about how to deal
with this situation are happening, and will probably continue to happen.
Communications from Stave Ma and the Budget Committee
I asked Steve about potential savings of eliminating the
Early Spring Semester. have not gotten much of a response.
Budget committee on Feb 14 discussed the idea of
eliminating the Early Spring Semester. Main idea from Celine was that early
spring is not pedagogically ideal because of its short length. There was very
little conviction that eliminating early spring would be a financial money
saver. The money on adjuncts would have to be spent in summer to make up the
FTES. Main point: this is a pedagogy argument, not a financial one.
AAAG / Adjunct Hiring Process
Discussed adjunct hiring on Feb 8, where both Doug and I
presented in a manner similar to here on Feb 2. They will discuss again on Feb
I have forwarded the process to VPSS and VPAS so that those
areas can have a look at it if they so choose.
I presented the hiring process at SSAG last week.
Barb and I are now considering comments. We'll share any
revisions with the committee and then it will come back here and to the advisory
groups. We got good comments, we're going to look at some things. The process is
Board meetings are now on Wednesday afternoons, when I have
class. Could somebody else represent the Academic Senate at the Board meetings
by giving a very short report?
New Senators and Elections
I am collecting names to include on a ballot for the at-large
representatives. Please recruit people you think would be good and tell us to
put their name on the ballot.
Bylaws state we should establish membership by March 1.
By our Exec meeting next Thursday, we'll establish a ballot.
By our next meeting on March 1, we'll have the results.
Senate Officers election is at the second meeting in March;
both old and new senators attend and vote.
MPC SLO Committee
A draft of the work on Program Review processes (making them
more consistent and providing more explicit connections to the Program
Reflections) is coming next time. Be ready.
NEW: I will go to the ICDE meeting on February 24 and talk
about the issue we discussed last time.
FROM LAST TIME:
As stated in the ICDE's
Strategic Initiative for the Growth and Development of MPC On-Line, some of
the goals are "fully on-line degree programs" and "fully on-line certificate
I've spent a bit of time talking with Judee Timm and Lynn
Iwamoto this week about the meaning of "fully on-line"
I think we should know and all agree on the definition of
For the CAC, fully on-line means more than 50% is at a
For others, fully on-line means that all instruction,
i.e., not assessment, is at a distance.
My opinion is that these distinctions are important. Neither
of the above definitions guarantee a truly distant student from completing our
fully on-line offerings. Is that what we collectively understand about "fully on
line", and is that what we want?
Late Breaking SSTF News
Possible Future Agenda Items
Report from this group:
quality instruction and services by investigating, and possibly revising, the
faculty evaluation and mentoring process (Mark, Kevin, Andres, Steve)
Establish topics to be included in faculty evaluation
procedures and materials. The MPCTA would then negotiate these procedures and
materials at an appropriate time.
Review and possibly revise the mentoring process
MPC SLO Committee work on creating a common program review format
across all areas of campus: AA, SS, AS. Diane Boynton will join us. This
will be an ACTION item.