Academic Senate
2013-2014 

Home

Student Learning
Outcomes

Accreditation

Board Policy
Review

Basic Skills

Flex Day
Info

Committees

 

Agendas

and Minutes

 

Agendas all on one page F2006-S2010

 

Agendas all on one page F2010 to present

 


AGENDA

March 6, 2014

2:30-4:00 in LTC 216

Agenda in printable form

 

Alfred Hochstaedter (President)

Kathleen Clark (VP)

Catherine Webb  (Secretary)

Mark Clements

Paola Gilbert

Lauren Handley

Merry Dennehy

Nancy Bingaman

Chris Calima

Robynn Smith

Eric Ogata

 

Elias Kary

Brian Brady

Alexis Copeland
Kevin Raskoff/

Andres Durstenfeld

Mike Torres

I.  Opening Business

A.  Public Comments

Any persons may have up to three minutes to address the Academic Senate on any subject not on the agenda today.

 

B. Approval of Draft Minutes from the Feb 20, 2014 meeting (2:30-2:35)  

 

II. Reports  

 

A. President Report Notes (2:35-2:40)  

 

B. COC (ACTION item) (2:40-2:45)

John Nelson for the PRB

 

C. Flex Report (2:45 - 3:00)

Heather Craig   .

 

D. Accreditation Report (3:00-3:20)

Fred Hochstaedter for Catherine Webb

Accreditation Standards are open for review.

Here is an incomplete draft of potential suggestions.

Will probably see a resolution about this at the Spring Plenary

 

In this public comment period, it may be interesting to look at other accrediting institutions' standards; here are three examples:

 

North Central Association Higher Learning Commission

http://policy.ncahlc.org/Policies/criteria-for-accreditation.html

Middle States Commission on Higher Education

https://www.msche.org/publications/CHX-2011-WEB.pdf

Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities

http://www.nwccu.org/Pubs%20Forms%20and%20Updates/Publications/Standards%20for%20Accreditation.pdf

E. Basic Skills Report (3:20-3:30)

Merry Dennehy

F. Student Success Initiative report (3:30-3:45)
Marty Johnson
Presentation

G. Noel Levitz Survey Announcement (3:45-3:50)

Rosaleen Ryan

III Old Business

 

IV New Business

 

A. Accreditation Resolution (Possible ACTION item) (3:50-4:15)

Background:

ACCJC is out of compliance with several USDE Criteria for Recognition

http://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/files/WASC-jr%20decision%20letter%20081313%20FINAL.pdf

The context for this finding can be found within the ASCCC's summary of Accreditation News and Events

http://www.asccc.org/content/accreditation-news-and-events

ACCJC has said that they only accept comments and critique from member institutions, not professional organizations such as the ASCCC, CTF, CCLC, or others.

 

This resolution still says "Grossmont" in it. That's where we got it. Should we endorse something similar?

1. Do we agree with this resolution?

2. Do we want to endorse it with the words "Monterey Peninsula College" in it?

3. If we like it, what should we do next with it? Some ideas:

a. Ask the institution to endorse it through College Council and/or the board

b. Send an endorsed copy to the Department of Education

c. Ask Walt to advocate for this with his colleagues at the CEOs meeting with the ACCJC in March

 

V. Future Agenda Items

A. gmail on March 20, Tech Plan on April 17